From: B.J. Guillot To: David Solem Thread: BGFAX\USR\Silly me (1/3) Date: 26-Apr-97, 12:40pm (Ref# 5262) > And for something completely different.. > I seem to have the trouble with missing parts of the 2,3 page faxes - > the usr 2.0 bug. > Would switching back to the class1 be better - now that I have the batch > files passing the correct information to the bbs? You can give Class 1 a shot and see if it works any better. Just insert these init strings into BGFAX.CNF: in=ATS0=0 in=AT+FCLASS=1 in=AT+FAA=1 an=ATA (the last is an answer string) Then, comment out the rest of your init strings. Also, you'll need to add an /ATO switch to your BGFAX /HOST command line. Regards, bgfax author
From: Alex Palisek To: B.J. Guillot Thread: BGFAX\USR\Silly me (2/3) Date: 05-May-97, 2:20am (Ref# 5305) Servus B.J.! 26 Apr 97 12:16, B.J. Guillot wrote to David Solem: BG> in=ATS0=0 BG> in=AT+FCLASS=1 BG> in=AT+FAA=1 BG> an=ATA BG> (the last is an answer string) There is one thing I do not understand: I tried to initialize (Answer string) my modem with AT+FCLASS=1 under FD 2.02, because I am not able to get it to work with FCLASS 2.0 correctly. Using the init in the auto-answer string, the response was ERROR! AT+FCLASS=1, directly at the "modem command line" (Alt-J) works fine, the response is OK. So why are the inits treated different? I have a USR V.everything USA/Canada model working here. I know the init-trouble has got nothing to do with BGFAX, but maybe someone here felt into the same mistyrious and can help me. ciao Alex --- mail protected by ColtED 3.00.Alpha5+ * Origin: Type +++ ATH0 to continue... (2:310/69)
From: B.J. Guillot To: Alex Palisek Thread: BGFAX\USR\Silly me (3/3) Date: 20-May-97, 2:54pm (Ref# 5337) > I tried to initialize (Answer string) my modem with AT+FCLASS=1 under FD 2.02 > because I am not able to get it to work with FCLASS 2.0 correctly. Using the > init in the auto-answer string, the response was ERROR! > AT+FCLASS=1, directly at the "modem command line" (Alt-J) works fine, the > response is OK. Do you mean FD 2.12? If you really are using FD 2.02, I don't know if I ever developed a working configuration for Class 1. Regards, bgfax author