From: Gary L. Murphy To: B.J. Guillot Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (1/34) Date: 03-Sep-97, 11:06am (Ref# 5665) On Fri 29 Aug 97 12:50p, B.J. Guillot was saying to Jason Steeves: bg> Also, even if the UNLOCKCMD was somehow processing, the WNFOSCTL bg> program doesn't work anyway. If that's the case, (and I'm not doubting you for an instant), what can we users do if we want to use WinFOSSIL, FD, and a USR V.Everything? Later, Gary <glmurphy@tad.org> --- FMail/Win32 1.22+ * Origin: * The Ratz Nest * Burleson Texas * (817) 447-1619 * (1:130/911)
From: Doug Reynolds To: Gary L. Murphy Thread: Re: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (2/34) Date: 04-Sep-97, 8:53am (Ref# 5670) GLM> If that's the case, (and I'm not doubting you for an instant), what GLM> can we users do if we want to use WinFOSSIL, FD, and a USR GLM> V.Everything? use BNU? the maverick # http://www.microserve.net/~mav/ # mav@microserve.net ... "I am *not* an assimilator." - Nixon of Borg --- GEcho/2 1.20/Pro * Origin: the rebel multiline 1X % 3.100Gs % 412/459.7290 (1:2610/0)
From: Gary L. Murphy To: Doug Reynolds Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (3/34) Date: 05-Sep-97, 5:44pm (Ref# 5673) On Thu 4 Sep 97 8:53a, Doug Reynolds was saying to Gary L. Murphy: dr> use BNU? SmartA**! :) Later, Gary <glmurphy@tad.org> --- FMail/Win32 1.22+ * Origin: * The Ratz Nest * Burleson Texas * (817) 447-1619 * (1:130/911)
From: B.J. Guillot To: Gary L. Murphy Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (4/34) Date: 06-Sep-97, 11:00am (Ref# 5674) > If that's the case, (and I'm not doubting you for an instant), what can we > users do if we want to use WinFOSSIL, FD, and a USR V.Everything? You don't need to unlock the port for a USR modem, so that point is not important. On your BGFAX command line, when specifying the COM port on the command line, place the letter "F" in front of the port, i.e., "F1" instead of "1" to represent COM1. Also, you might want to help out BGFAX in determing the DTE by specifying (at the end of the command line), a /DTE:nnnnn switch, i.e., (/DTE:57600) Regards, bgfax author
From: Gary L. Murphy To: B.J. Guillot Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (5/34) Date: 06-Sep-97, 10:21pm (Ref# 5682) On Sat 6 Sep 97 11:00a, B.J. Guillot was saying to Gary L. Murphy: bg> line, place the letter "F" in front of the port, i.e., "F1" instead of bg> "1" to represent COM1. Added that. bg> specifying (at the end of the command line), bg> a /DTE:nnnnn switch, i.e., (/DTE:57600) Already had this. Just tested it using my other line from the same computer and it worked great! Guess since I use a "Good" modem I can still use WinFossil & BGFax, eh? :) Oh, one other thing. What does the below mean? (clip from log) WARNING: RTC not detected (0) Thanks again! Later, Gary <glmurphy@tad.org> --- FMail/Win32 1.22+ * Origin: * The Ratz Nest * Burleson Texas * (817) 447-1619 * (1:130/911)
From: Gary L. Murphy To: B.J. Guillot Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (6/34) Date: 06-Sep-97, 11:37pm (Ref# 5683) On Sat 6 Sep 97 11:00a, B.J. Guillot was saying to Gary L. Murphy: Just noticed something strange. When using WinFossil I'm not able to use the Win32 version of BGFax. FD exits out with the defined errorlevel, but it just sits there and finally FD reloads. When using X00, I can use it without a hitch. Suggestions? Later, Gary <glmurphy@tad.org> --- FMail/Win32 1.22+ * Origin: * Official FrontDoor Beta Site * (1:130/911)
From: Doug Reynolds To: Gary L. Murphy Thread: Re: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (7/34) Date: 08-Sep-97, 10:09am (Ref# 5689) GLM> Just noticed something strange. GLM> When using WinFossil I'm not able to use the Win32 version of BGFax. GLM> FD exits out with the defined errorlevel, but it just sits there and GLM> finally FD reloads. When using X00, I can use it without a hitch. GLM> Suggestions? In the most part, when you have a 16 bit application open the comport, it is best to use the 16 bit version of bgfax. I tried using bgfax/2 when I was using portal of power.. no good.. now I use binkley/2 and bgfax/2 without a problem. the maverick # http://www.microserve.net/~mav/ # mav@microserve.net ... Letterman of Borg - "Ok, Top 10 reasons why resistance is futile:" --- GEcho/2 1.20/Pro * Origin: the rebel multiline 1X % 3.100Gs % 412/459.7290 (1:2610/0)
From: Gary L. Murphy To: Doug Reynolds Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (8/34) Date: 08-Sep-97, 6:54pm (Ref# 5691) On Mon 8 Sep 97 10:09a, Doug Reynolds was saying to Gary L. Murphy: dr> In the most part, when you have a 16 bit application open the comport, dr> it is best to use the 16 bit version of bgfax. dr> I tried using bgfax/2 when I was using portal of power.. no good.. I can certainly understand, and do agree with that. However, that's not what's happining. When I use WinFossil, (a 32-bit VxD), it (the 32-bit version of BGFax), does not work. When using a 16 bit program to open the port, (IE: X00 and FD), it does. Just backward of what you stated. Strange, eh? :) Later, Gary <glmurphy@tad.org> --- FMail/Win32 1.22+ * Origin: * Official FrontDoor Beta Site * (1:130/911)
From: Kevin Berry To: Gary L. Murphy Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (9/34) Date: 09-Sep-97, 1:57pm (Ref# 5694) Hello Gary! On Monday September 08 1997, Gary L. Murphy spewed forth to Doug Reynolds: GM> When I use WinFossil, (a 32-bit VxD), it (the 32-bit version of GM> BGFax), does not work. When using a 16 bit program to open the port, GM> (IE: X00 and FD), it does. Just backward of what you stated. Strange, GM> eh? :) That's due to a Windows95 limitation. It cannot pass the port between to a 32-bit program from anything. The only way a 32-bit program can use a serial port is if it is the one to open it in the first place. Later Days, Kevin <spamite@iname.com> or <rberry@arlington.net> ... How about them apples.... --- GED/386-Squish1.11-BT/XE5 * Origin: The D.C.P. Point I, 'There isn't enough bloody mail!' (1:130/222.1)
From: Gary L. Murphy To: Kevin Berry Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (10/34) Date: 09-Sep-97, 5:14pm (Ref# 5695) On Tue 9 Sep 97 1:57p, Kevin Berry was saying to Gary L. Murphy: kb> That's due to a Windows95 limitation. It cannot pass the port between kb> to a 32-bit program from anything. The only way a 32-bit program can use kb> a serial port is if it is the one to open it in the first place. Let's assume you are correct. (Now, read below very slowly) X00 is a 16-bit program that has =already opened= the port. If what you are saying is correct, it should =not= be able to hand off to a 32-bit program, since as you stated above, the port was already opened by =another= program. But it does. Kinda shoots your theory down the drain, eh? Later, Gary <glmurphy@tad.org> --- FMail/Win32 1.22+ * Origin: * The Ratz Nest * Burleson Texas * (817) 447-1619 * (1:130/911)
From: Doug Reynolds To: Gary L. Murphy Thread: Re: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (11/34) Date: 09-Sep-97, 2:42pm (Ref# 5696) GLM> When I use WinFossil, (a 32-bit VxD), it (the 32-bit version of GLM> BGFax), does not work. When using a 16 bit program to open the port, GLM> (IE: X00 and FD), it does. Just backward of what you stated. Strange, GLM> eh? :) Definately odd. Unless, B.J. designed it that way... the maverick # http://www.microserve.net/~mav/ # mav@microserve.net ... Dirty Harry of Borg: "Go ahead... resist us." --- GEcho/2 1.20/Pro * Origin: the rebel multiline 1X % 3.100Gs % 412/459.7290 (1:2610/0)
From: Doug Reynolds To: Kevin Berry Thread: Re: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (12/34) Date: 09-Sep-97, 11:59pm (Ref# 5697) GM> When I use WinFossil, (a 32-bit VxD), it (the 32-bit version of GM> BGFax), does not work. When using a 16 bit program to open the port, GM> (IE: X00 and FD), it does. Just backward of what you stated. Strange, GM> eh? :) KB> That's due to a Windows95 limitation. It cannot pass the port KB> between to a 32-bit program from anything. The only way a 32-bit KB> program can use a serial port isif it is the one to open it in the KB> first place. then how come people use bink32 and max32? the maverick # http://www.microserve.net/~mav/ # mav@microserve.net ... His ears made him look like a taxicab with both doors open. --- GEcho/2 1.20/Pro * Origin: the rebel multiline 1X % 3.100Gs % 412/459.7290 (1:2610/0)
From: Kevin Berry To: Gary L. Murphy Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (13/34) Date: 10-Sep-97, 5:37am (Ref# 5700) Hello Gary! On Tuesday September 09 1997, Gary L. Murphy spewed forth to Kevin Berry: GM> X00 is a 16-bit program that has =already opened= the port. If what GM> you are saying is correct, it should =not= be able to hand off to a GM> 32-bit program, since as you stated above, the port was already opened GM> by =another= program. But it does. See netmail. Its losing the topic of this echo.. Later Days, Kevin <spamite@iname.com> or <rberry@arlington.net> ... Any priest or shaman is guilty until proven innocent. --- GED/386-Squish1.11-BT/XE5 * Origin: The D.C.P. Point I, 'There isn't enough bloody mail!' (1:130/222.1)
From: Kevin Berry To: Doug Reynolds Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (14/34) Date: 10-Sep-97, 2:45pm (Ref# 5702) Hello Doug! On Tuesday September 09 1997, Doug Reynolds spewed forth to Kevin Berry: GM>> When I use WinFossil, (a 32-bit VxD), it (the 32-bit version of GM>> BGFax), does not work. When using a 16 bit program to open the GM>> port, (IE: X00 and FD), it does. Just backward of what you GM>> stated. Strange, eh? :) KB>> That's due to a Windows95 limitation. It cannot pass the port KB>> between to a 32-bit program from anything. The only way a 32-bit KB>> program can use a serial port isif it is the one to open it in KB>> the first place. DR> then how come people use bink32 and max32? Name me one person who does this at the SAME time, under Windows95. Later Days, Kevin <spamite@iname.com> or <rberry@arlington.net> ... DOS=HIGH? I knew it was on something... --- GED/386-Squish1.11-BT/XE5 * Origin: The D.C.P. Point I, 'There isn't enough bloody mail!' (1:130/222.1)
From: Gary L. Murphy To: Kevin Berry Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (15/34) Date: 10-Sep-97, 6:41pm (Ref# 5703) On Wed 10 Sep 97 2:45p, Kevin Berry was saying to Doug Reynolds: KB>>> That's due to a Windows95 limitation. It cannot pass the port KB>>> between to a 32-bit program from anything. The only way a 32-bit KB>>> program can use a serial port isif it is the one to open it in KB>>> the first place. kb> Name me one person who does this at the SAME time, under Windows95. Look at =both= of your replies =very= carefully. They are mutualy exclusive. Later, Gary <glmurphy@tad.org> --- FMail/Win32 1.22+ * Origin: * The Ratz Nest * Burleson Texas * (817) 447-1619 * (1:130/911)
From: Kevin Berry To: Gary L. Murphy Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (16/34) Date: 11-Sep-97, 5:50am (Ref# 5704) Hello Gary! On Wednesday September 10 1997, Gary L. Murphy spewed forth to Kevin Berry: KB>>>> That's due to a Windows95 limitation. It cannot pass the port KB>>>> between to a 32-bit program from anything. The only way a KB>>>> 32-bit program can use a serial port isif it is the one to open KB>>>> it in the first place. kb>> Name me one person who does this at the SAME time, under kb>> Windows95. GM> Look at =both= of your replies =very= carefully. They are mutualy GM> exclusive. hRm? I merely state that it impossible to pass from one to the other. What's wrong with that? Bink32 simply is not able to pass the port to Max32, thanks to Windows95 serial port architecture. Later Days, Kevin <spamite@iname.com> or <rberry@arlington.net> ... I am NOT a complete slut! I'm just 'user friendly' --- GED/386-Squish1.11-BT/XE5 * Origin: The D.C.P. Point I, 'There isn't enough bloody mail!' (1:130/222.1)
From: Gary L. Murphy To: Kevin Berry Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (17/34) Date: 11-Sep-97, 7:56am (Ref# 5707) On Thu 11 Sep 1997 5:50A, Kevin was overheard saying, kb> hRm? I merely state that it impossible to pass from one to the other. kb> What's wrong with that? Bink32 simply is not able to pass the port to kb> Max32, thanks to Windows95 serial port architecture. Then we have a major problem here. If Bink32 has the port open and a BBS caller comes in, it =must= pass the port over to Max32. Either that or Bink32 closes the port, (in which case the call is dropped), and then Max32 re-opens it. I don't really think so, Kevin. Later, Gary <glmurphy@tad.org> --- * Origin: * Here's your sign...... * (1:130/911.6286)
From: Doug Reynolds To: Kevin Berry Thread: Re: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (18/34) Date: 11-Sep-97, 11:52am (Ref# 5709) DR> then how come people use bink32 and max32? KB> Name me one person who does this at the SAME time, under Windows95. I don't know any one personally, but I read posts in the binkley echo, where they use bink32 as a frontend, and max32 as the bbs. the maverick # http://www.microserve.net/~mav/ # mav@microserve.net ... Government corruption seems always to be reported in the past tense. --- GEcho/2 1.20/Pro * Origin: the rebel multiline 1X % 3.100Gs % 412/459.7290 (1:2610/0)
From: Kevin Berry To: Gary L. Murphy Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (19/34) Date: 11-Sep-97, 4:24pm (Ref# 5711) Hello Gary! On Thursday September 11 1997, Gary L. Murphy spewed forth to Kevin Berry: kb>> hRm? I merely state that it impossible to pass from one to the kb>> other. What's wrong with that? Bink32 simply is not able to pass kb>> the port to Max32, thanks to Windows95 serial port architecture. GM> Then we have a major problem here. If Bink32 has the port open and a GM> BBS caller comes in, it =must= pass the port over to Max32. Either GM> that or Bink32 closes the port, (in which case the call is dropped), GM> and then Max32 re-opens it. I don't really think so, Kevin. That's the way it works, Gary. The only way to support a BBS under Bink/32 is if the BBS is a DOS bbs. If its Win32, then it will occur exactly as you describe above. Later Days, Kevin <spamite@iname.com> or <rberry@arlington.net> ... The incomprehensible thing about the world is that it is. --- GED/386-Squish1.11-BT/XE5 * Origin: The D.C.P. Point I, 'There isn't enough bloody mail!' (1:130/222.1)
From: Austin Phelps To: Doug Reynolds Thread: Re: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (20/34) Date: 10-Sep-97, 8:01pm (Ref# 5712) KB>> That's due to a Windows95 limitation. It cannot pass the port > then how come people use bink32 and max32? Because you have to close the port and then re-open it. That how I do it. I use Argus and pass to Dos Max. Austin --- Msged 4.10 * Origin: Lightning Rod - Orlando, Florida (1:363/263.3)
From: Austin Phelps To: Kevin Berry Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (21/34) Date: 11-Sep-97, 7:19pm (Ref# 5713) > hRm? I merely state that it impossible to pass from one to the other. > What's wrong with that? Bink32 simply is not able to pass the port to > Max32, thanks to Windows95 serial port architecture. It easy. In your modem init remove the &D1 and change it to &D0 (windows drops DTR when closing the port) and use the AT command for hanging up (ATH or ATH0). Call my system and see it in action. I use Argus (a shareware Win95 GUI based on Binkley) and DOS Max. The only reason I use the Dos version instead of the Win32 version is that I need to pass to doors. Austin --- Msged 4.10 * Origin: Lightning Rod - Orlando, Florida (1:363/263.3)
From: Doug Reynolds To: Austin Phelps Thread: Re: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (22/34) Date: 13-Sep-97, 8:49am (Ref# 5720) AP> Because you have to close the port and then re-open it. AP> That how I do it. I use Argus and pass to Dos Max. ic. I knew you should be able to do it. the maverick # http://www.microserve.net/~mav/ # mav@microserve.net ... Get too many irons in your fire and you'll put it out. --- GEcho/2 1.20/Pro * Origin: the rebel multiline 1X % 3.100Gs % 412/459.7290 (1:2610/0)
From: B.J. Guillot To: Gary L. Murphy Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (23/34) Date: 19-Oct-97, 9:50am (Ref# 5759) > Oh, one other thing. What does the below mean? (clip from log) > WARNING: RTC not detected (0) If the fax was actually readable, this warning message can be ignored. If the fax was not readable, or not complete, then it means something bad happened. :-) The "RTC" is a sequence that signifies the end of the page image stream. However, some modems actually filter the RTC out. (The only one I can think of that does that is the Multitech modems.) Regards, bgfax author
From: B.J. Guillot To: Gary L. Murphy Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (24/34) Date: 19-Oct-97, 9:51am (Ref# 5760) > When using WinFossil I'm not able to use the Win32 version of BGFax. FD exits > out with the defined errorlevel, but it just sits there and finally FD reload > When using X00, I can use it without a hitch. If you're using a DOS mailer, you must use the DOS BGFAX. BGFAX32 is for stand-alone use, or for use with a Win32-based BBS or mailer, such as Wildcat 5, PX32, Beemail32, etc. Regards, bgfax author
From: B.J. Guillot To: Doug Reynolds Thread: Re: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (25/34) Date: 19-Oct-97, 9:53am (Ref# 5761) > In the most part, when you have a 16 bit application open the comport, it is > best to use the 16 bit version of bgfax. I tried using bgfax/2 when I was > using portal of power.. no good.. Your theory is mostly sound, except, note that BGFAX2 is still a 16-bit application. However, if you use an OS/2 mailer or BBS software, whether 16-bit or 32-bit, it's always best to use the OS/2 version of BGFAX to go along with it. Regards, bgfax author
From: Gary L. Murphy To: B.J. Guillot Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (26/34) Date: 19-Oct-97, 9:34pm (Ref# 5781) On Sun 19 Oct 97 9:50a, B.J. Guillot was saying to Gary L. Murphy: bg> If the fax was actually readable, this warning message can be ignored. bg> If the fax was not readable, or not complete, then it means something bad bg> happened. :-) It's been awhile, but to the best of my feeble mind, it was readable. :) bg> The "RTC" is a sequence that signifies the end of the page image stream. Hokay... bg> However, some modems actually filter the RTC out. (The only one I can bg> think of that does that is the Multitech modems.) I'm running a USR Courier V.Everything.... Later, Gary <glmurphy@tad.org> --- FMail/Win32 1.40g+ * Origin: * The Ratz Nest * Burleson Texas * (817) 447-1619 * (1:130/911)
From: Gary L. Murphy To: B.J. Guillot Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (27/34) Date: 19-Oct-97, 9:35pm (Ref# 5782) On Sun 19 Oct 97 9:51a, B.J. Guillot was saying to Gary L. Murphy: bg> If you're using a DOS mailer, you must use the DOS BGFAX. Yeah, kinda figured that..... :-^) Later, Gary <glmurphy@tad.org> --- FMail/Win32 1.40g+ * Origin: * The Ratz Nest * Burleson Texas * (817) 447-1619 * (1:130/911)
From: John Lucci To: Gary L. Murphy Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (28/34) Date: 27-Oct-97, 1:01am (Ref# 5796) ;rep:7708,3255 -=> Quoting Gary L. Murphy to B.j. Guillot <=- GLM> On Sun 19 Oct 97 9:50a, B.J. Guillot was saying to Gary L. Murphy: bg> If the fax was actually readable, this warning message can be ignored. bg> If the fax was not readable, or not complete, then it means something bad bg> happened. :-) GLM> It's been awhile, but to the best of my feeble mind, it was readable. GLM> :) bg> The "RTC" is a sequence that signifies the end of the page image stream. GLM> Hokay... bg> However, some modems actually filter the RTC out. (The only one I can bg> think of that does that is the Multitech modems.) GLM> I'm running a USR Courier V.Everything.... It's been my expereince that Winfossil flat doesn't work. I dumped it even though my old setup was less than perfect. BNU 1.70 locked at 57,600 and loaded low. (OSR2 just wouldn't allow it to load high.) *.. "What?!? This isn't the Files section?!?" ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
From: Gary L. Murphy To: John Lucci Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (29/34) Date: 31-Oct-97, 9:24pm (Ref# 5802) On Mon 27 Oct 97 1:01a, John Lucci was saying to Gary L. Murphy: jl> It's been my expereince that Winfossil flat doesn't work. I dumped it jl> even though my old setup was less than perfect. BNU 1.70 locked at jl> 57,600 and loaded low. (OSR2 just wouldn't allow it to load high.) Well, don't know what to say. It, WinFossil v1.12.004, is working without a hitch here, and has been for a long time now. Later, Gary <glmurphy@tad.org> --- FMail/Win32 1.40g+ * Origin: * The Ratz Nest * Burleson Texas * (817) 447-1619 * (1:130/911)
From: John Lucci To: Gary L. Murphy Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (30/34) Date: 01-Nov-97, 9:32pm (Ref# 5804) ;rep:7708,3255 -=> Quoting Gary L. Murphy to John Lucci <=- GLM> On Mon 27 Oct 97 1:01a, John Lucci was saying to Gary L. Murphy: jl> It's been my expereince that Winfossil flat doesn't work. I dumped it jl> even though my old setup was less than perfect. BNU 1.70 locked at jl> 57,600 and loaded low. (OSR2 just wouldn't allow it to load high.) GLM> Well, don't know what to say. It, WinFossil v1.12.004, is working GLM> without a hitch here, and has been for a long time now. GLM> Later, GLM> Gary GLM> <glmurphy@tad.org> BGFAX seemed to be happy with it but TAG2.7C wouldn't get the right port speed. Things would look fine on my end but the user would get garbage.. *.. The 1st rule of Politics is always maintain deniability. ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
From: John Lucci To: Gary L. Murphy Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (31/34) Date: 01-Nov-97, 7:32pm (Ref# 5807) ;rep:7708,3255 -=> Quoting Gary L. Murphy to John Lucci <=- GLM> On Mon 27 Oct 97 1:01a, John Lucci was saying to Gary L. Murphy: jl> It's been my expereince that Winfossil flat doesn't work. I dumped it jl> even though my old setup was less than perfect. BNU 1.70 locked at jl> 57,600 and loaded low. (OSR2 just wouldn't allow it to load high.) GLM> Well, don't know what to say. It, WinFossil v1.12.004, is working GLM> without a hitch here, and has been for a long time now. GLM> Later, GLM> Gary GLM> <glmurphy@tad.org> BGFAX seemed to be happy with it but TAG2.7C wouldn't get the right port speed. Things would look fine on my end but the user would get garbage.. *.. The 1st rule of Politics is always maintain deniability. ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
From: Gary L. Murphy To: John Lucci Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (32/34) Date: 05-Nov-97, 3:36pm (Ref# 5812) On Sat 1 Nov 97 9:32p, John Lucci was saying to Gary L. Murphy: jl> BGFAX seemed to be happy with it but TAG2.7C wouldn't get the right jl> port speed. Things would look fine on my end but the user would get jl> garbage.. Sounds like the wrong info is being passed to the BBS. Later, Gary <glmurphy@tad.org> --- FMail/Win32 1.40g+ * Origin: * The Ratz Nest * Burleson Texas * (817) 447-1619 * (1:130/911)
From: John Lucci To: Gary L. Murphy Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (33/34) Date: 07-Nov-97, 11:39am (Ref# 5822) ;rep:7708,3255 -=> Quoting Gary L. Murphy to John Lucci <=- GLM> On Sat 1 Nov 97 9:32p, John Lucci was saying to Gary L. Murphy: jl> BGFAX seemed to be happy with it but TAG2.7C wouldn't get the right jl> port speed. Things would look fine on my end but the user would get jl> garbage.. GLM> Sounds like the wrong info is being passed to the BBS. GLM> Later, GLM> Gary GLM> <glmurphy@tad.org> Yeah I figured that out once I started thinking about it. I now have it working with Winfossil *.. Optimism is a mania for saying all is well when one is in hell. ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
From: B.J. Guillot To: Gary L. Murphy Thread: WinFossil and BGFax 2 (34/34) Date: 22-Nov-97, 5:23pm (Ref# 5838) > bg> However, some modems actually filter the RTC out. (The only one I can > bg> think of that does that is the Multitech modems.) > I'm running a USR Courier V.Everything.... Hmm... The USR Courier does not filter out the RTC, so you might have some kind of problem. I may need to see a copy of the FAX file itself if you continue to have this problem. Regards, bgfax author